Skip to main content

Science – Society – Technology

Table 5 Input parameter used for petrophysical modelling of the volcanic rock section

From: From pilot knowledge via integrated reservoir characterization to utilization perspectives of deep geothermal reservoirs: the 3D model of Groß Schönebeck (North German Basin)

 

Tuffitic layers

Andesitic lava beds

Model parameter

Well log data

Model parameter

Well log data

Core data

bed thickness (m)

0.3–2.9 (1.4)

Interpreted from E GrSk 3/90 and Gt GrSk 4/05

0.4–7.0 (2.2)

Interpreted from E GrSk 3/90 and Gt GrSk 4/05

PHIT (dec)

0–0.13 (0.05 ± 0.02)

0–0.13 (0.03 ± 0.03) [31]

0–0.11 (0.06 ± 0.02)

0–0.11 (0.04 ± 0.02) [195]

PHIGEb (dec)

0–0.06 (0.02 ± 0.01)

Not evaluated

0–0.08 (0.04 ± 0.01)

Not evaluated

0 .03–0.06 (0.05 ± 0.01) [11]

BDc (kg/m3)

2420–2890 (2660 ± 120)

2422–2878 (2682 ± 84) [31]

2460–2830 (2640 ± 103)

2460–2763 (2623 ± 60) [195]

2580–2655 (2632 ± 28) [11]

PERM (m2)

0–8.9E−17 (9.90E−18)

1.77E−21 to 8.5E−16 (1.75E−19; GSD: 66, ranging from 2.66E−21 to 1.15E−17)a [31]

0–5.9E−17 (9.90E−18)

1.77E−21 to 6.11E−17 (4.83E−18; GSD: 4.3, ranging from 1.11E−18 to 2.09E−17)a [195]

0–1.38E−17 (4.9E−19; GSD: 17.4, ranging from 2.82E−20 to 8.52E−18)a [10]

TC (Wm−1 K−1)

1.4–2.1 (1.9 ± 0.1)

1.5–1.9 (1.9 ± 0.1) [31]

1.6–2.1 (1.9 ± 0.1)

1.6–1.9 (1.9 ± 0.1) [195]

2.1 [1]

TD (10–6 m2s−1)

0.50–0.82 (0.69 ± 0.03)

0.58–0.78 (0.75 ± 0.05) [31]

0.55 –0.80 (0.69 ± 0.03)

0.61–0.78 (0.73 ± 0.04) [195]

0.83 [1]

SHC (Jkg−1 K−1)

884–1195 (1021 ± 66)

888–1190 (981 ± 75) [31]

903–1154 (1030 ± 60)

920–1153 (1015 ± 47) [195]

976 [1]

Variogram inputd

2000/1500/2, 330

2000/1500/3, 330

  1. Given is the range and mean (in brackets) chosen for the modelling and the supporting well-log and core data (if available) with the respective standard deviation and the number of observations (in square brackets)
  2. aGeometric mean with geometric standard deviation factor (GSD)
  3. bCollocated co-Kriging with total porosity (PHIT) using a correlation coefficient of 0.8
  4. cCollocated co-Kriging with total porosity (PHIT) using a correlation coefficient of − 0.8
  5. dInput for a spherical variogram (given: major/minor/vertical [m], azimuth [°]). If not specified otherwise, all data refer to the E GrSk 3/90 borehole, laboratory thermal data are corrected to in-situ conditions, see text