Fig. 12From: Stress sensitivity of porosity and permeability under varying hydrostatic stress conditions for different carbonate rock types of the geothermal Malm reservoir in Southern Germanya Relationship between stress sensitivity coefficients and the porosity sensitivity coefficient \(\beta \). The stress sensitivity coefficients \({S}_{s}^{\varPhi }\) for porosity and \({S}_{s}^{k}\) for permeability are compared with a set of data from different authors. While \({S}_{s}^{\varPhi }\) shows no significant correlation with \(\beta \), \({S}_{s}^{k}\) is clearly increasing with increasing \(\beta \). Higher values of \(\beta \) indicate a progressively increasing contribution of fracture pores and micro-fractures to the effective permeability network and result in higher \({S}_{s}^{k}\) values. Data for sandstone are taken from Xu et al. (2018) and for limestone compiled from Meng et al. (2019), Teklu et al. (2018), and Dautriat et al. (2011). b Porosity sensitivity is related to the effective pore throat size controlling the flow through the pore network. The exponent \(\beta \) increases with decreasing pore throat size, which indicates a decoupling of the stress sensitivity from porosity and permeabilityBack to article page