Skip to main content

Science – Society – Technology

Table 3 Overview of porosity measurements from different projects for the Malm aquifer in the Bavarian Molasse Basin

From: Porosity–permeability relationship derived from Upper Jurassic carbonate rock cores to assess the regional hydraulic matrix properties of the Malm reservoir in the South German Molasse Basin

Stratigraphy

Outcrop

Outcrop/subsurface

Subsurface

Epoch

Age

Quenstedt and Richter (1987)

STD (2016)

Hedtmann and Alber (2018)

Mraz et al. (2018)

Homuth (2014)

Dingolfing FB

Limestonea

Dolostonea

Moosburg SC 4

Pullach (Th 2)b

Unterhaching (Gt Uha 1/1a)c

This studyd

Böhm (2012)

This studyd

Mean

n

Min

Max

Med

n

Min

Max

Med

n

Min

Max

Med ± MAD

n

Min–Max (Med)

Min–Max (Med)

n

Min

Max

Med ± MAD

n

Min–Max (Med)

Early Cretaceous

Purbeck

                  

0.5

17.3

4.6 ± 2.5

73

< 3.0

n = 5

 

Late Jurassic

Tithonian

Malm ζ 4–5

Rennertshofen & Usseltal Fm.

      

< 0.1

17.8

5.1

381

3.3

15.7

10.7 ± 5.1

6

0.7–17.1 (3.8), n = 14

1.5–6.7 (3.2), n = 9

  

3.1

19.2

13.6 ± 4.5

32

5.0–10.0

n = 10

 

Malm ζ 3

Mörnsheim Fm.

  

5.6

8.6

7.0

13

  

2.5

3.9

3.1 ± 0.3

18

9.0

n = 2

Malm ζ 2

Altmülthal Fm.

  

3.7

14.8

7.0

31

1.8

17.7

3.5 ± 1.8

9

0.6–2.1 (0.7)

3

0.3

10.2

5.6 ± 3.4

35

1.0–4.0

(2.5), n = 4

Malm ζ 1

Geisental Fm.

5.8

25

4.0

8.5

5.8

21

4.2

12.2

9.2 ± 3.9

5

0.9 – 17.1 (7.3)

5

0.3

18.4

2.1

± 1.5

32

 

Kimmeridgian

Malm ε

Torleite Fm.

3.6

11.2

6.9

13

0.9

10.4

9.6

81

2.5

12.7

4.6

± 1.1

19

1.1 – 5.4 (3.3)

2

0.5

5.9

2.9 ± 1.7

19

 

Malm δ

Treuchtlingen Fm.

8.4

28

1.6

6.9

4.6

29

0.4

6.9

2.7

226

2.3

6.3

3.2

± 0.7

12

2.4 – 7.6 (5.0)

2

0.7

4.7

2.3 ± 1.1

36

< 5.0

n = 3

6.0–18.0 (14.0), n = 4

Malm γ

Arzberg Fm.

      

< 0.1

7.5

1.8

112

    

1.4

1

1.1

3.2

2.0 ± 0.3

15

  

Oxfordian

Malm β

Dietfurt Fm.

      

0.2

10.2

3.3

181

      

0.4

3.5

2.0 ± 0.3

14

  

Malm α

      

0.5

9.9

6.2

145

      

0.3

10.3

1.0 ± 0.5

18

  

Middle Jurassic

Dogger ζ

                  

3.8

15.4

7.9 ± 2.4

20

  
  1. aKoch et al. (2009), bBöhm et al. (2010), cBeichel et al. (2014), dporosity effective for water \(\phi_{\text{eff}}^{\text{w}}\), unit = %, Min minimum, Max maximum, Med median, MAD median absolute deviation, n count