Skip to main content
Geothermal Energy

Science – Society – Technology

Fig. 12 | Geothermal Energy

Fig. 12

From: Porosity–permeability relationship derived from Upper Jurassic carbonate rock cores to assess the regional hydraulic matrix properties of the Malm reservoir in the South German Molasse Basin

Fig. 12

Comparison of different permeability models with the permeability of rock cores. a Most models seem to underestimate the permeability compared to core permeability of the Moosburg SC4 well, especially in vuggy zones in the lower well section. b Besides the Berg model, all models show a relatively good fit for the well Dingolfing FB to permeability measured on rock cores. c Correlation of the measured and modeled permeability in a log–log plot to validate the model quality. The GPPT model seems to be the most reliable model based on the data set

Back to article page