Science – Society – Technology
Table 4 Pore pressure calibration table and modeling rationale
# | Average deviation (g/cm3) | Comment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chattian | Rupelian | Lat./San. | U. Cret. | |||
1 | 40% | 40% | KT | KT | − 0.48 | Too low → Chattian or Rupelian clay content > 40% |
2 | 70% | 70% | KT | KT | 0.01 | Good |
3 | 90% | 90% | KT | KT | 0.34 | Too high |
4 | 40% | 70% | KT | KT | − 0.41 | Too low → Chattian and Rupelian clay content > 40% |
Decision: Chattian and Rupelian clay content ≥ 70% | ||||||
5 | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% | − 0.37 | Too low |
6 | 70% | 70% | 70% | 90% | − 0.29 | Too low |
7 | 70% | 70% | 70% | KT | − 0.09 | Good |
8 | 70% | 70% | 90% | 70% | − 0.34 | Too low |
9 | 70% | 70% | 90% | 90% | − 0.26 | Too low |
10 | 70% | 70% | 90% | KT | − 0.08 | Good |
11 | 70% | 70% | KT | 70% | − 0.11 | Good |
12 | 70% | 70% | KT | 90% | − 0.08 | Good |
13 | 70% | 90% | 90% | 90% | − 0.20 | Too low |
14 | 70% | 90% | 90% | KT | 0.01 | Good |
15 | 70% | 90% | KT | 90% | − 0.03 | Good |
16 | 70% | 90% | KT | KT | 0.08 | Good |
17 | 90% | 90% | 90% | 90% | − 0.01 | Good |
18 | 90% | 90% | 90% | KT | 0.16 | Too high |
19 | 90% | 90% | KT | 90% | 0.27 | Too high |
Sensitivity study → Lat./San. and/or U. Cret. clay content = 40% | ||||||
20 | 90% | 90% | 40% | 40% | − 0.17 | Too low → Lat./San. or U. Cret. clay content > 40% |
21 | 90% | 90% | 40% | KT | 0.12 | Good |
22 | 90% | 90% | KT | 40% | 0.21 | Too high |
23 | 70% | 70% | KT | 40% | − 0.13 | Good |
24 | 70% | 90% | 40% | KT | − 0.02 | Good |
25 | 70% | 70% | 40% | KT | − 0.10 | Good |