Skip to main content

Science – Society – Technology

Table 2 Thermal properties assigned to the lithostratigraphic units and the range of values tested in the sensitivity study

From: The 3D conductive thermal field of the North Alpine Foreland Basin: influence of the deep structure and the adjacent European Alps

Lithostratigraphic unit

Dominant lithology

References

Thermal conductivity (W/mK)

References

Radiogenic heat production (W/m3)

References

Nördlinger Ries

Lacustrine sediments, impact breccia

1

2.1 ± 0.6

1

1 × 10−6 ± 0.5 × 10−6

3

Alpine Body

Limestone, dolomite, marl, clay, silt, conglomerate

2

2.2 ± 0.6

3

3 × 10−7 ± 5 × 10−7

3

Folded Molasse Sediments

Conglomerate, sand, silt, clay

2

2.1 ± 0.6

7

1 × 10−6 ± 0.2 × 10−6

3

Foreland Molasse Sediments

Conglomerate, sand, silt, clay

2

2.1 ± 0.6

7

1 × 10−6 ± 0.3 × 10−6

3

Cretaceous

Claystone, limestone

2

2.4 ± 0.5

7

1.4 × 10−6 ± 0.3 × 10−6

3

Upper Jurassic Malm

Limestone, dolomite

2

2.7 ± 0.5

7

1.4 × 10−6 ± 0.4 × 10−6

3

PreMalm Sediments

Claystone, sandstone, marl

2

2.7 ± 0.4

7

1 × 10−6 ± 0.6 × 10−6

3

Tauern Body

Granite, gneiss, shale

3

2.6 ± 0.8

5

1.8 × 10−6 ± 1 × 10−6

3

Upper crystalline crust

Granite/granodiorite

3

3.1 ± 0.7

5

1.8 × 10−6 ± 0.7 × 10−6

3

Lower crystalline crust

Gabbro

4

2.7 ± 0.8

5

7 × 10−7 ± 3 × 10−7

3

Lithospheric mantle

Peridotite

6

3.0 ± 0.7

5

3 × 10−8 ± 5 × 10−8

3

  1. References: [1] Ernstson and Pohl (1977), [2] Freudenberger and Schwerd (1996), [3] Landolt-Börnstein (1982), [4] Ebbing (2002), [5] Marotta and Splendore (2014), [6] Allen and Allen (2005), [7] Koch et al. (2009)