The 3D conductive thermal field of the North Alpine Foreland Basin: influence of the deep structure and the adjacent European Alps

Anna M. Przybycin; Magdalena Scheck-Wenderoth; Michael Schneider

doi:10.1186/s40517-015-0038-0

Geothermal Energy

Science – Society – Technology

Table 1 Temperature measured in geothermal production sites at different depths and calculated temperatures extracted from the 3D model for the corresponding coordinates

From: The 3D conductive thermal field of the North Alpine Foreland Basin: influence of the deep structure and the adjacent European Alps

ID	Location	UTM coordinates		Depth (m asl)	Temperature measured (°C)	Temperature calculated (°C]	Temp difference calc. − meas. (K)	References
1	Traunreut	768326.3446	5317920.521	−4095.710	108	153	45	Agemar et al. (2014a)
2	Poing	709645.0836	5338567.483	−2464.960	76	103	27	Agemar et al. (2014a)
3	Pullach 2	687645.8845	5324767.734	−2361.960	80	104	24	Agemar et al. (2014a)
4	Erding	716537.888	5354505.059	−1894.809	62	83	21	Agemar et al. (2014a)
5	Pullach	687645.8845	5324767.734	−2920.960	104	119	15	Agemar et al. (2014a)
6	Aschheim	701945.275	5338366.932	−2117.904	85	94	9	Agemar et al. (2014a)
7	Garching	696945.2515	5346766.704	−1683.616	70	79	9	ITG (2014)
8	Garching	696945.2515	5346766.704	−1744.916	74	80	6	Agemar et al. (2014a)
9	Sauerlach	698045.8424	5316267.778	−3852.980	140	146	6	Agemar et al. (2014a)
10	Dürrnhaar	704145.653	5318768.12	−3504.876	135	139	4	Agemar et al. (2014a)
11	München Riem	700893.3825	5334418.605	−2155.422	95	95	1	Agemar et al. (2014a)
12	Oberhaching	693645.4216	5321868.061	−3232.777	128	128	1	Agemar et al. (2014a)
13	Straubing	761610.226	5420054.051	−500.613	37	36	−1	Agemar et al. (2014a)
14	Unterhaching	695375.7952	5325900.639	−3031.660	123	122	−2	Agemar et al. (2014a)
15	Simbach-Braunau	800291.3264	5352101.534	−1586.610	81	75	−6	Agemar et al. (2014a)
16	Unterschleißheim	690746.0027	5349666.83	−1484.859	78	72	−6	Agemar et al. (2014a)
17	Kirchstockach	699744.9973	5322467.964	−3384.942	139	132	−7	Agemar et al. (2014a)
18	Unterföhring	696542.4435	5340811.137	−1484.408	86	75	−11	Agemar et al. (2014a)
19	Bad Saulgau	537376.4201	5317524.491	−21.667	41	30	−11	Werner (1978)
20	Waldkraiburg	752496.3402	5344579.67	−2291.049	109	96	−13	Agemar et al. (2014a)
21	Landshut	732766.0605	5379951.31	−72.503	60	27	−33	Agemar et al. (2012)
22	Bruchsal	469755.6067	5440897.013	−2409.251	120	64	−56	GTV (2014)
23	Bad Urach	529623.6519	5371419.002	−3862.813	168	101	−67	Agemar et al. (2012)
24	Windischeschenbach	724584.8959	5522239.823	−8638.671	253	183	−70	Agemar et al. (2014a)

The differences between measured and modelled temperature values are shown in Fig. 6

Back to article page