Science – Society – Technology
From: Evaluating an enhanced thermal response test (ETRT) with high groundwater flow
Sampling depth | Thermal conductivity |
---|---|
z [m bgl] | λ [W m−1 K−1] |
0.54–1.57 | 1.9 ± 0.2 |
1.57–2.74 | 1.5 ± 0.1 |
2.74–3.00 | 2.2 ± 0.1 |
3.00–3.40 | 2.4 ± 0.1 |
3.40–4.61 | 2.5 ± 0.1 |
4.61–5.33 | 2.1 ± 0.1 |
4.61–5.33 | 2.7 ± 0.1 |
5.33–6.62 | 2.7 ± 0.1 |
6.62–7.56 | 2.5 ± 0.1 |
7.56–8.00 | 2.3 ± 0.1 |
8.00–8.60 | 2.6 ± 0.1 |
8.60–9.64 | 2.9 ± 0.1 |
9.64–10.91 | 2.5 ± 0.1 |
11.00–11.48 | 2.8 ± 0.1 |
11.48–13.00 | 2.7 ± 0.1 |
13.00–13.75 | 2.8 ± 0.1 |
13.75–15.00 | 2.8 ± 0.1 |
15.00–15.41 | 2.6 ± 0.1 |
15.41–15.78 | 2.3 ± 0.1 |
15.78–17.63 | 2.7 ± 0.1 |
17.63–19.00 | 2.4 ± 0.1 |
19.00–19.43 | 2.5 ± 0.1 |
19.43–19.64 | 2.5 ± 0.1 |
19.64–21.00 | 2.6 ± 0.1 |
21.00–23.43 | 2.6 ± 0.1 |
Average | 2.5 ± 0.4 |