Skip to main content
Geothermal Energy

Science – Society – Technology

Table 2 Fitted permeabilities for the hydrothermal simulations (left) and comparison to values from other modelling studies (right): Fulignati et al. (2014) [1] and Romagnoli et al. (2010) [2]

From: Influence of depth, temperature, and structure of a crustal heat source on the geothermal reservoirs of Tuscany: numerical modelling and sensitivity study

Unit

−log (k[m2])

Other modelling studies

[1]

[2]

(a) Pliocene

18

  

(b) Ligurian

18

17

≥20

(c) TUaB

18

17

≥20

(d) Burano

14.0–15.4

13

13–16

(e) Farma

17.0–18.0

16.3

 

Deep reservoir within Farma

13.7–14.0

13.3

 
  1. The given ranges are due to the dependence of permeability on depth. Values in italics indicate estimated values (not fitted)
Back to article page